Cases against Turkey Declared Admissible
Kurdish Human Rights Project
Compte d’auteur
The Wider Significance of the Admissibility Decisions in this Volume
Three of the cases reported in this volume concern the ill-treatment and/or killing of HADEP representatives in Adana in 1994-1995. Abdulsamet Yaman complains that he was arrested and tortured by the police in 1995. Haci Sait Macir was shot dead at his Adana cafe on 30 December 1994/1 January 1995. Both were provincial HADEP leaders. The applicant in a third case, Ahmet Dizman, had been an eyewitness to the killing of HADEP leaders Rehib Qabuk and Sefer Cerf in Adana in October 1994. Two days later Dizman himself was abducted and beaten by police officers. A fourth case, Binbay, concerns the alleged ill-treatment by the police of a former president of the Van branch of the Human Rights Association of Turkey.
….
Contents
1. Introduction by the Executive Director / 3
Decision 69 T.A. & M.A. - Application No. 26307/95 [30 June 1997]
Decision 70 Faysal AKMAN - Application No. 37453/97 [21 September 1999]
Decision 71 Yasin ATES - Application No. 30949/96 [19 October 1999]
Decision 72 Abdurrahman CELIKBILEK - Application No. 27693/95 [22 June 1999]
Decision 73 Zubeyir DUNDAR - Application No. 26972/95 [24 August 1999]
Decision 74 Ulku EKINCI - Application No. 27602/95 [8 June 1999]
Decision 75 Nesime HARAN - Application No. 28299/95 [22 June 1999]
Decision 76 Hayriye KISMIR - Application No. 27306/95 [14 December 1999]
Decision 77 Huseyin TOGCU - Application No. 27601/95 [14 September 1999]
Decision 78 Abdulsamet YAMAN - Application No. 32446/96 [14 December 1999]
Decision 79 Yavuz BINBAY - Application No. 24922/94 [3 February 2000]
Decision 80 Ahmet DIZMAN - Application No. 27309/95 [18 January 2000]
Decision 81 Beyaz MAC1R - Application No. 28516/95 [28 March 2000]
3. Appendices
A. The European Convention on Human Rights System and
Procedure and control mechanism flow chart
B. Update on KHRP assisted cases before the
European Commission and Court of Human Rights through
8 June 1999 through March 2000
C. Chronological list of main events in cases assisted by the KHRP
D. Update on non-KHRP cases against Turkey
Index to admissibility decisions listed in Volumes 1 to 7
1. INTRODUCTION BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
The year 1999 and the early months of 2000 saw an acceleration of KHRP cases working their way through the Strasbourg system. From the beginning of 1999 through March of 2000, admissibility decisions were made in twelve KHRP cases. This volume reproduces these twelve admissibility decisions, plus an earlier decision from 30 June 1997 which was not included in earlier volumes.
This volume also contains an update on other KHRP-assisted cases and tracks their progress through the Strasbourg system. This includes descriptions of decisions of the Commission on Human Rights on the merits, cases referred to the European Court of Human Rights and hearings attended by the KHRP legal team. Also included are a summary of judgments handed down in nine KHRP cases during the period, among them two key freedom of expression judgments (Ocgiir Giindem v. Turkey, Kilic v. Turkey) which have struck deep at the heart of the Turkish legal system.
A comprehensive schedule of all KHRP cases to July 2000, together with extensive analysis, is included in KHRP’s publication Turkey and the European Convention on Human Rights: A Report on the Litigation Programme of the Kurdish Human Rights Project by Carla Buckley, available from KHRP.
These cases are brought as part of KHRP’s Litigation and Training project, which since 1992 has assisted over 400 applicants to bring their cases to the European Commission and Court of Human Rights against Turkey in respect of violations of the Convention. This case report is part of a series entitled Cases Against Turkey Declared Admissible,1 2 2 and KHRP also publishes a separate series of judgments of the Court in addition to analytical and thematic reports.
The judgments of the European Court represent the end of a long road for the applicants in all cases. These judgments are an important vindication of the rights of the individual applicants who persisted in seeking justice before the Strasbourg organs often in the face of pressure and intimidation from Turkish authorities. Just as significant is the effect of these judgments more generally on the overall human rights situation in Turkey. One of the important results of the judgments has been to create greater international awareness of the human rights situation in Turkey and also to stimulate debate on the ground regarding the issues surrounding the applicants' complaints. However, the full impact of the cases will only become clear over time and will require careful monitoring.
As can be seen in the chart summarising the European Convention process, which is contained in Appendix A of this report, the first important decision reached in each case is the finding as to the admissibility of each complaint. This volume contains 13 cases, which have been declared admissible or partially admissible by the Commission and Court from the beginning of 1999 to the end of March 2000. It also contains updates on other KHRP cases and on cases not assisted by KHRP, in Appendices C, D and E, and in Appendix A, an outline of the new system and procedure at the European Court of Human Rights under Protocol 11, in effect since 1 November 1998.
The finding of admissibility is important, not least because it allows the case to proceed for fuller consideration by the European Court; but especially because by finding the case admissible the Commission or Court is saying that the allegations made are not “manifestly ill-founded”. In addition, before an application is declared admissible, applicants must show that they have exhausted all available domestic remedies, or, alternatively, that the available remedies were ineffective.
The ineffectiveness of domestic remedies is one of the key complaints in each of the cases included in this volume. It is argued not only as a procedural issue so as to permit a finding of admissibility, but also as a substantive complaint. The failure to provide a system which punishes those responsible for torture, unlawful killings and the wanton destruction of homes and communities and the failure to provide a remedy are violations in themselves and constitute serious problems which must be overcome if Turkey’s human rights situation is to improve.
Despite signs of improvement in the law in Turkey, gross violations of rights continue to occur as a matter of practice in Southeast Turkey. The Kurdish Human Rights Project will continue to assist individuals who wish to pursue their cases before the European Court of Human Rights as a means of promoting the rule of law and ensuring accountability of state agents in Turkey.
Finally, the Kurdish Human Rights Project wishes to thank the many individuals and organisations who, through their support and assistance, have made this work possible, Paul Richmond and Nusrat Chagtai who drafted this report, and the funders without whose generosity our achievements would not be possible.
Kerim Yildiz
Executive Director
December 2000
Kurdish Human Rights Project
Cases against Turkey
Compte d'auteur
Compte d'auteur
Cases against Turkey Declared Admissible
By the European Commission and Court of Human Rights
Part of a series of cases brought by KHRP on behalf of
applicants from the Kurdish regions
Volume 7, December 2000
Suite 319 Linen Hall
162-168 Regent Street
London W1R 5TB
Tel: 020 7287 2772
Fax: 020 7734 4927
Email: khrp@khrp.demon.co.uk
Registered Charity (No 1037236)
A Company Limited by Guarantee
Registered in England No 2922108
ISBN: 1 900175 34 7
Published by the Kurdish Human Rights Project, London (December 2000)
This report was compiled by Paul Richmond and edited by the
Kurdish Human Rights Project.
Editorial Team
Kerim Yildiz / Sally Eberhardt
Fiona McKay / Nusrat Chagtai
Philip Leach
For further information on the cases,
please contact the Kurdish Human Rights Project, Suite 319,
Linen Hall, 162-168 Regent Street,
London W1R 5TB, England.
Telephone: +44 20 7287 2772
Facsimile: +44 20 7734 4927
E-mail: khrp@khrp.demom.co.uk
Website: http://www.khrp.org
We wish to acknowledge that the
Admissibility Decisions contained in this report,
were produced in their original form by the
European Court of Human Rights, Council of Europe,
F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex, France.
Website: http://www.dhcour.coe.fr
The price of this publication (£10) covers printing and
other costs associated with its production and distribution.
KHRP Cases against Turkey declared Admissible by the
European Commission and Court of Human Rights
Volume 7 December 2000
